Introduction: The gold standard treatment for high-risk NMIBC is BCG immunotherapy. Some studies suggested an immomodulatory effects for commonly used drugs (ie, ACE-I and ARBs). We aimed to determine whether these drugs impact the prognosis of patients with high-risk NMIBC treated with BCG. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis on 208 patients from a single academic center with primary high-risk NMIBC treated with transurethral resection followed by 6 weekly instillations of BCG and up to 12 monthly maintenance instillations. ARBs or ACE-I use at the time of treatment initiation was recorded. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for clinical and pathological covariates. IPTW–adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and weighted Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare 2-yr failure-free (2-yr FFS), failure-free (FFS), overall recurrence-free (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 68 patients were on ACE-I, and 38 on ARBs and treatment respectively. At a median follow-up of 26 months, ACE-I treatment had no significant impact on cancer-related outcomes. Conversely, patients treated with ARBs experienced significant improvements in 2-yr FFS (HR 0.3; 0.1-0.9, P = .004), FFS (HR 0.4, 0.1-0.9, P = .005), and PFS (HR 0.001; < 0.001-0.001, P < .001). No significant impact was found for ARB use in RFS (HR 0.6; P = .09). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these results. Conclusions: our findings support a potential role of the angiotensin-renin system in bladder cancer development. We identified ARBs as potential beneficial drugs that seems to act in synergy with BCG-immunotherapy.

Role of Renin-Angiotensin System Blockers on BCG Response in Nonmuscle Invasive, High Risk Bladder Cancer

Motterle G.
;
Morlacco A.;Giovannini G.;Vecchiato E.;Iafrate M.;Dal Moro F.;Novara G.
2022

Abstract

Introduction: The gold standard treatment for high-risk NMIBC is BCG immunotherapy. Some studies suggested an immomodulatory effects for commonly used drugs (ie, ACE-I and ARBs). We aimed to determine whether these drugs impact the prognosis of patients with high-risk NMIBC treated with BCG. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis on 208 patients from a single academic center with primary high-risk NMIBC treated with transurethral resection followed by 6 weekly instillations of BCG and up to 12 monthly maintenance instillations. ARBs or ACE-I use at the time of treatment initiation was recorded. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for clinical and pathological covariates. IPTW–adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and weighted Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare 2-yr failure-free (2-yr FFS), failure-free (FFS), overall recurrence-free (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 68 patients were on ACE-I, and 38 on ARBs and treatment respectively. At a median follow-up of 26 months, ACE-I treatment had no significant impact on cancer-related outcomes. Conversely, patients treated with ARBs experienced significant improvements in 2-yr FFS (HR 0.3; 0.1-0.9, P = .004), FFS (HR 0.4, 0.1-0.9, P = .005), and PFS (HR 0.001; < 0.001-0.001, P < .001). No significant impact was found for ARB use in RFS (HR 0.6; P = .09). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these results. Conclusions: our findings support a potential role of the angiotensin-renin system in bladder cancer development. We identified ARBs as potential beneficial drugs that seems to act in synergy with BCG-immunotherapy.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3440348
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact