The paper aims to discuss the remarks and criticisms that have been raised in the essays discussing my book The Life of Concepts. Hegel, Bachelard, Canguilhem . I focus firstly on the relationship that I establish between conceptual history and epistemology of concepts; then, I consider some purely epistemological criticisms; finally, I focus on the problem of political science and its relationship with the social sciences. In the last section of the paper, I attempt to address the more comprehensive questio n of the role of philosophy and its relationship to sciences.

Il concetto, la scienza, la politica. In dialogo con i miei critici

Pierpaolo Cesaroni
2022

Abstract

The paper aims to discuss the remarks and criticisms that have been raised in the essays discussing my book The Life of Concepts. Hegel, Bachelard, Canguilhem . I focus firstly on the relationship that I establish between conceptual history and epistemology of concepts; then, I consider some purely epistemological criticisms; finally, I focus on the problem of political science and its relationship with the social sciences. In the last section of the paper, I attempt to address the more comprehensive questio n of the role of philosophy and its relationship to sciences.
2022
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Cesaroni - Concetto scienza politica.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Published (publisher's version)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 329.62 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
329.62 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3457671
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact