The essay aims to investigate the influence of Lichtenberg’s thinking within Nietzsche’s thought. The first part of the essay analyses the eighteenth-century debate around physiognomy between Lichtenberg and Lavater, with the aim of showing how Lichtenberg anticipates in many respects a dynamic and plural conception of subjectivity. The second part of the essay analyses Nietzsche’s direct references to Lichtenberg between 1867 and 1873. In particular, I emphasise the importance of Lichtenberg’s writing style for Nietzsche and the influence it also had on Schopenhauer. The third part of the essay analyses Nietzsche’s use of Lichtenberg’s thought in the first Untimely Meditation. What emerges is a contrast between Lichtenberg as a sceptical, anti-religious Enlightenment scholar and David Strauss as a cultural philistine. The final part of the essay dwells on the philosophical significance of aphoristic writing, placing it in close relation to Lichtenberg and Nietzsche’s critique of the Cartesian method.

«Un mondo libero dotato di trasformabilità camaleontica». Nietzsche lettore di Lichtenberg

Alberto Giacomelli
2023

Abstract

The essay aims to investigate the influence of Lichtenberg’s thinking within Nietzsche’s thought. The first part of the essay analyses the eighteenth-century debate around physiognomy between Lichtenberg and Lavater, with the aim of showing how Lichtenberg anticipates in many respects a dynamic and plural conception of subjectivity. The second part of the essay analyses Nietzsche’s direct references to Lichtenberg between 1867 and 1873. In particular, I emphasise the importance of Lichtenberg’s writing style for Nietzsche and the influence it also had on Schopenhauer. The third part of the essay analyses Nietzsche’s use of Lichtenberg’s thought in the first Untimely Meditation. What emerges is a contrast between Lichtenberg as a sceptical, anti-religious Enlightenment scholar and David Strauss as a cultural philistine. The final part of the essay dwells on the philosophical significance of aphoristic writing, placing it in close relation to Lichtenberg and Nietzsche’s critique of the Cartesian method.
2023
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3502805
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact