Objectives In patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma (LARC), negative nodal status after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) may allow for rectum-sparing protocols rather than total mesorectal excision; however, current MRI criteria for nodal staging have suboptimal accuracy. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of different MRI dimensional criteria for nodal staging after nCRT in patients with LARC.Materials and methods Patients who underwent MRI after nCRT for LARC followed by surgery were retrospectively included and divided into a training and a validation cohort of 100 and 39 patients, respectively. Short-, long-, and cranial-caudal axes and volume of the largest mesorectal node and nodal status based on European Society of Gastrointestinal Radiology consensus guidelines (i.e., ESGAR method) were assessed by two radiologists independently. Inter-reader agreement was assessed in the training cohort. Histopathology was the reference standard. ROC curves and the best cut-off were calculated, and accuracies compared with the McNemar test.Results The study population included 139 patients (median age 62 years [IQR 55-72], 94 men). Inter-reader agreement was high for long axis (kappa = 0.81), volume (kappa = 0.85), and ESGAR method (kappa = 0.88) and low for short axis (kappa = 0.11). Accuracy was similar (p > 0.05) for long axis, volume, and ESGAR method both in the training (71%, 74%, and 65%, respectively) and in the validation (83%, 78%, and 75%, respectively) cohorts.Conclusion Accuracy of the measurement of long axis and volume of the largest lymph node is not inferior to the ESGAR method for nodal staging after nCRT in LARC.Clinical relevance statement In MRI restaging of rectal cancer, measurement of the long axis or volume of largest mesorectal lymph node after preoperative chemoradiotherapy is a faster and reliable alternative to ESGAR criteria for nodal staging.
Nodal staging with MRI after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a fast and reliable method
Crimi', Filippo;Cabrelle, Giulio;Bao, Quoc Riccardo;Pepe, Alessia;Spolverato, Gaya;Pucciarelli, Salvatore;Quaia, Emilio
2023
Abstract
Objectives In patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma (LARC), negative nodal status after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) may allow for rectum-sparing protocols rather than total mesorectal excision; however, current MRI criteria for nodal staging have suboptimal accuracy. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of different MRI dimensional criteria for nodal staging after nCRT in patients with LARC.Materials and methods Patients who underwent MRI after nCRT for LARC followed by surgery were retrospectively included and divided into a training and a validation cohort of 100 and 39 patients, respectively. Short-, long-, and cranial-caudal axes and volume of the largest mesorectal node and nodal status based on European Society of Gastrointestinal Radiology consensus guidelines (i.e., ESGAR method) were assessed by two radiologists independently. Inter-reader agreement was assessed in the training cohort. Histopathology was the reference standard. ROC curves and the best cut-off were calculated, and accuracies compared with the McNemar test.Results The study population included 139 patients (median age 62 years [IQR 55-72], 94 men). Inter-reader agreement was high for long axis (kappa = 0.81), volume (kappa = 0.85), and ESGAR method (kappa = 0.88) and low for short axis (kappa = 0.11). Accuracy was similar (p > 0.05) for long axis, volume, and ESGAR method both in the training (71%, 74%, and 65%, respectively) and in the validation (83%, 78%, and 75%, respectively) cohorts.Conclusion Accuracy of the measurement of long axis and volume of the largest lymph node is not inferior to the ESGAR method for nodal staging after nCRT in LARC.Clinical relevance statement In MRI restaging of rectal cancer, measurement of the long axis or volume of largest mesorectal lymph node after preoperative chemoradiotherapy is a faster and reliable alternative to ESGAR criteria for nodal staging.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
