BACKGROUND: QuantiFeron-TB (QIFN) is a whole-blood interferon-;gamma assay for the recognition of cell-mediated immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. OBJECTIVES: To compare the QIFN assay with the tuberculin skin test (TST) in patients with newly diagnosed culture-proven tuberculosis (TB) and healthy volunteers with high or low risk of latent M tuberculosis infection and to identify factors associated with discordance between tests. METHOD: Two-hundred fifty-eight subjects underwent both assays. All participants completed a detailed questionnaire, and data from TB patients' medical records were collected. RESULTS: In the entire study population, agreement between tests was moderate and the correlation between the magnitude of QIFN response and the TST induration diameter was significant. In volunteers with no known risk of exposure to M tuberculosis, the specificity of the assays was comparable. However, in subjects with active TB or those vaccinated with bacille Calmette-Guérin, the QIFN assay detected more reactors than did the TST. In these individuals, agreement between assays was poor and no correlation or only a weak correlation was found between the diameter of TST induration and the magnitude of the interferon-gamma responses. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of the QIFN assay is greater than that of the TST in patients with active TB before the initiation of anti-TB chemotherapy, but its specificity is influenced more by bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccination. The QIFN assay may provide an improvement over the current practice of the use of the TST to support diagnosis of active M tuberculosis infection in the clinic; however, QIFN cannot be considered an adequate replacement for the TST in the screening for latent infection.

Comparison of a whole-blood interferon-gamma assay and tuberculin skin testing in patients with active tuberculosis and individuals at high or low risk of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection

MELONI, FEDERICA;
2003

Abstract

BACKGROUND: QuantiFeron-TB (QIFN) is a whole-blood interferon-;gamma assay for the recognition of cell-mediated immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. OBJECTIVES: To compare the QIFN assay with the tuberculin skin test (TST) in patients with newly diagnosed culture-proven tuberculosis (TB) and healthy volunteers with high or low risk of latent M tuberculosis infection and to identify factors associated with discordance between tests. METHOD: Two-hundred fifty-eight subjects underwent both assays. All participants completed a detailed questionnaire, and data from TB patients' medical records were collected. RESULTS: In the entire study population, agreement between tests was moderate and the correlation between the magnitude of QIFN response and the TST induration diameter was significant. In volunteers with no known risk of exposure to M tuberculosis, the specificity of the assays was comparable. However, in subjects with active TB or those vaccinated with bacille Calmette-Guérin, the QIFN assay detected more reactors than did the TST. In these individuals, agreement between assays was poor and no correlation or only a weak correlation was found between the diameter of TST induration and the magnitude of the interferon-gamma responses. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of the QIFN assay is greater than that of the TST in patients with active TB before the initiation of anti-TB chemotherapy, but its specificity is influenced more by bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccination. The QIFN assay may provide an improvement over the current practice of the use of the TST to support diagnosis of active M tuberculosis infection in the clinic; however, QIFN cannot be considered an adequate replacement for the TST in the screening for latent infection.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3510643
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 66
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 55
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact