Parmigiano Reggiano (PR), a very hard and long-ripened cheese, is one of the most significant dairy chains in Italy, under the regulation of a specific Consortium. This study aimed to assess the relationship between global warming (GWP, kg CO2-eq) and acidification potential (AP, g SO2-eq) and on-farm animal welfare in PR farms. Data derived from 243 farms (145±159 cows, 26±6 kg fat- and protein-corrected milk – FPCM/lactating cow/d). The GWP (global-related impact, per 1 kg FPCM) and AP (local-related one, per 1 m2) were estimated with Life Cycle Assessment. All farms underwent an assessment of animal welfare with IZSLER/CReNBA protocol, that encompassed various areas, including management (A), structure (B), and animal-based measure (C), utilizing a scoring system ranging from 0 to 100. Values of GWP, AP and A-B-C areas scores were analysed with Pearson’s correlation analysis. The GWP resulted positively and significantly correlated with AP and negatively with A and B scores, although all with low r values (0.25, -0.37 and -0.23, respectively). AP resulted not correlated with A, B or C scores. Within welfare scores, A and B resulted highly correlated (r = 0.60). When considering only on-farm AP, no correlation was found with GWP, A, B or C scores. In conclusion, various aspects of a dairy farm’s overall sustainability exhibit complex relationships. However, there is room for improvement in one aspect without worsening some others.

Relationship between environmental impact and on-farm dairy cow welfare in Parmigiano Reggiano farms

M Berton;L Gallo;A Cecchinato;Sturaro E
2024

Abstract

Parmigiano Reggiano (PR), a very hard and long-ripened cheese, is one of the most significant dairy chains in Italy, under the regulation of a specific Consortium. This study aimed to assess the relationship between global warming (GWP, kg CO2-eq) and acidification potential (AP, g SO2-eq) and on-farm animal welfare in PR farms. Data derived from 243 farms (145±159 cows, 26±6 kg fat- and protein-corrected milk – FPCM/lactating cow/d). The GWP (global-related impact, per 1 kg FPCM) and AP (local-related one, per 1 m2) were estimated with Life Cycle Assessment. All farms underwent an assessment of animal welfare with IZSLER/CReNBA protocol, that encompassed various areas, including management (A), structure (B), and animal-based measure (C), utilizing a scoring system ranging from 0 to 100. Values of GWP, AP and A-B-C areas scores were analysed with Pearson’s correlation analysis. The GWP resulted positively and significantly correlated with AP and negatively with A and B scores, although all with low r values (0.25, -0.37 and -0.23, respectively). AP resulted not correlated with A, B or C scores. Within welfare scores, A and B resulted highly correlated (r = 0.60). When considering only on-farm AP, no correlation was found with GWP, A, B or C scores. In conclusion, various aspects of a dairy farm’s overall sustainability exhibit complex relationships. However, there is room for improvement in one aspect without worsening some others.
2024
Book of Abstracts of the 75th Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science
Global quality: environment, animals, food
979-12-210-6769-9
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3524861
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact