This paper examines the Flightright ruling in light of previous case law regarding Regulation 261/2004. In particular, on one hand, the analysis focuses on how the Court of Justice seized the opportunity to significantly expand airline passenger guarantees, by clarifying the notions of "connecting flight" and "single reservation". On the other hand, it investigates the extent to which the Court of Justice extended compensatory liability.
La tutela del passeggero per il ritardo del volo in coincidenza: nuovi spunti dalla sentenza Flightright
emanuela de falco
2023
Abstract
This paper examines the Flightright ruling in light of previous case law regarding Regulation 261/2004. In particular, on one hand, the analysis focuses on how the Court of Justice seized the opportunity to significantly expand airline passenger guarantees, by clarifying the notions of "connecting flight" and "single reservation". On the other hand, it investigates the extent to which the Court of Justice extended compensatory liability.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
