To mitigate the issue of accumulating glass waste, an advanced process has been developed for the production of glass foams via alkaline activation, employing industrial glass cullet as the primary raw material. This method contributes to circular economy strategies by enabling high-value upcycling of secondary raw materials. The aim of the study is to conduct an environmental assessment of this recycling process using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The analysis is performed with SimaPro software, adopting the ReCiPe impact assessment method, which allows for the quantification of 18 impact categories. Four distinct foaming processes were compared to determine the most environmentally preferable option and a sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess how variations in energy sources influence the environmental performance. The findings indicate that the scenario involving hardening at 40 °C for seven days results in the highest environmental burdens. Specifically, in the Human Carcinogenic Toxicity category, the normalized impacts for this process are approximately an order of magnitude greater. Electricity consumption is identified as the primary contributor to the overall impact. The sensitivity analysis underscores that utilizing photovoltaic panels reduces impacts. Future developments will focus on expanding the system boundaries to provide a more comprehensive understanding and supporting informed decision-making.
Life Cycle Assessment of Industrial Glass Cullet Recycling Process Based on Alkaline Activation
elena battiston;enrico bernardo;anna mazzi
2025
Abstract
To mitigate the issue of accumulating glass waste, an advanced process has been developed for the production of glass foams via alkaline activation, employing industrial glass cullet as the primary raw material. This method contributes to circular economy strategies by enabling high-value upcycling of secondary raw materials. The aim of the study is to conduct an environmental assessment of this recycling process using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The analysis is performed with SimaPro software, adopting the ReCiPe impact assessment method, which allows for the quantification of 18 impact categories. Four distinct foaming processes were compared to determine the most environmentally preferable option and a sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess how variations in energy sources influence the environmental performance. The findings indicate that the scenario involving hardening at 40 °C for seven days results in the highest environmental burdens. Specifically, in the Human Carcinogenic Toxicity category, the normalized impacts for this process are approximately an order of magnitude greater. Electricity consumption is identified as the primary contributor to the overall impact. The sensitivity analysis underscores that utilizing photovoltaic panels reduces impacts. Future developments will focus on expanding the system boundaries to provide a more comprehensive understanding and supporting informed decision-making.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
ceramics-08-00109.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Published (Publisher's Version of Record)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.3 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.3 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.