The essay analyzes the controversy between Sarah and Angelina Grimké, Catharine Beecher and Harriet Martineau concerning the abolition of slavery and women’s rights, by focusing on two critical tools: the “bonds of womanhood” and the “analogy” between the condition of woman and that of the slave. This rich and tense comparison shows that the recognition or non-recognition of the link between racial and sexual domination is decisive in defining different conceptions of womanhood. Moreover, these differences have an impact on the way some key concepts for democ-racy are understood and on the possibility of rethinking them critically

Vincolare l’analogia. Una geografia polemica dell’abolizionismo femminile

anna guerini
2023

Abstract

The essay analyzes the controversy between Sarah and Angelina Grimké, Catharine Beecher and Harriet Martineau concerning the abolition of slavery and women’s rights, by focusing on two critical tools: the “bonds of womanhood” and the “analogy” between the condition of woman and that of the slave. This rich and tense comparison shows that the recognition or non-recognition of the link between racial and sexual domination is decisive in defining different conceptions of womanhood. Moreover, these differences have an impact on the way some key concepts for democ-racy are understood and on the possibility of rethinking them critically
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3559986
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact