In this essay, I investigate the ways in which abolitionists and pro-slavery forces use Tocqueville before and during the Civil War, drawing on the major black and white abolitionist newspapers (The Liberator, National Anti-Slavery Standard, The National Era, The North Star, and The Colored American). By focusing on the dissemination of Tocqueville’s ideas within a specific audience of white abolitionists, and on the impact of blacks’ criticism on this process, I challenge Tocqueville’s abolitionist arguments. Thus, using Tocqueville as a prism through which to discuss some of the key issues surrounding the abolitionist struggles, I show that the author’s reception depends on the relevance of these struggles and claims for the definition of democracy itself as an endless and potentially unmanageable process.

Ambivalent Democracies. Uses and Misuses of Tocqueville Within the Abolitionist Debate (1839–1865)

Anna Guerini
2024

Abstract

In this essay, I investigate the ways in which abolitionists and pro-slavery forces use Tocqueville before and during the Civil War, drawing on the major black and white abolitionist newspapers (The Liberator, National Anti-Slavery Standard, The National Era, The North Star, and The Colored American). By focusing on the dissemination of Tocqueville’s ideas within a specific audience of white abolitionists, and on the impact of blacks’ criticism on this process, I challenge Tocqueville’s abolitionist arguments. Thus, using Tocqueville as a prism through which to discuss some of the key issues surrounding the abolitionist struggles, I show that the author’s reception depends on the relevance of these struggles and claims for the definition of democracy itself as an endless and potentially unmanageable process.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3559987
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact