: The lack of a standardized methodology complicates accuracy assessment in computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction. Existing landmark-based methods are susceptible to operator variability, while surface-based comparisons can mask local deviations. This study validates a novel, automated protocol, the Global Positioning Layout (GPL), to quantify the 3D discrepancy between the virtual surgical plan and the postoperative outcome, by comparing its performance and reliability against Methods A and B. A retrospective cohort of 17 patients was analysed, with three operators performing all measurements on two occasions. The GPL method demonstrated complete reproducibility, with no inter- or intra-operator variability, providing a detailed, spatially-oriented assessment of deviations. In contrast, the landmark-based method showed poor reproducibility and systematic bias and was often inapplicable due to the absence of landmarks after resection. The surface-based method, while objective for its mean error metric, was operator-dependent for initial alignment and its non-directional output masked significant localized deviations. This study validates GPL as a robust and fully reproducible tool that overcomes the critical limitations of established techniques. The GPL method provides a strong foundation for a standardized protocol, essential for the reliable comparison of surgical outcomes, refinement of surgical techniques, and improvement of long-term patient outcomes.

Automated Global Positioning Layout (GPL) for accuracy assessment in CAD-CAM mandibular reconstruction - Method validation

Vargiu, Elisa
Methodology
;
Saia, Giorgia
Writing – Review & Editing
;
Meneghello, Roberto
Conceptualization
;
Bedogni, Alberto
Conceptualization
2026

Abstract

: The lack of a standardized methodology complicates accuracy assessment in computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction. Existing landmark-based methods are susceptible to operator variability, while surface-based comparisons can mask local deviations. This study validates a novel, automated protocol, the Global Positioning Layout (GPL), to quantify the 3D discrepancy between the virtual surgical plan and the postoperative outcome, by comparing its performance and reliability against Methods A and B. A retrospective cohort of 17 patients was analysed, with three operators performing all measurements on two occasions. The GPL method demonstrated complete reproducibility, with no inter- or intra-operator variability, providing a detailed, spatially-oriented assessment of deviations. In contrast, the landmark-based method showed poor reproducibility and systematic bias and was often inapplicable due to the absence of landmarks after resection. The surface-based method, while objective for its mean error metric, was operator-dependent for initial alignment and its non-directional output masked significant localized deviations. This study validates GPL as a robust and fully reproducible tool that overcomes the critical limitations of established techniques. The GPL method provides a strong foundation for a standardized protocol, essential for the reliable comparison of surgical outcomes, refinement of surgical techniques, and improvement of long-term patient outcomes.
2026
Electronic
Inglese
Inglese
16
1
Medical Research, Diagnosis & Treatment contains studies of existing and developing diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, as well as specific classes of clinical intervention. Resources in this category emphasize the difference between normal and disease states, with the ultimate goal of more effective diagnosis and intervention. Specific areas of interest include pathology and histochemical analysis of tissue, clinical chemistry and biochemical analysis of medical samples, diagnostic imaging, radiology and radiation, surgical research, anesthesiology and anesthesia, transplantation, artificial tissues, and medical implants. Resources focused on the disease, diagnosis, and treatment of specific organs or physiological systems are excluded and are covered in the Medical Research: Organs & Systems category.
Accuracy assessment, Validation; Computer-Aided Manufacturing,; Mandibular reconstruction, Computer-Aided Design,; Prosthesis,
ITALIA
no
open
Vargiu, Elisa; Tognin, Laura; Bettini, Giordana; Menapace, Giorgia; Franco, Piero; Saia, Giorgia; Bedogni, Giorgio; Meneghello, Roberto; Bedogni, Albe...espandi
01 CONTRIBUTO IN RIVISTA::01.01 - Articolo in rivista
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
9
262
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
unpaywall-bitstream--1755390768.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Published (Publisher's Version of Record)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.8 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.8 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3587939
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact