This article off ers a systematic analysis of Ethos-Based Organizations (EBOs) — institutions whose identity, mission, and internal governance are shaped by a distinct ideological, religious, or philosophical ethos. Building on European and Italian legal sources, the study identifi es three constitutive elements of EBOs: (1) their nature as structured and durable organizations; (2) the presence of a clearly defi ned ideological character, grounded in religion or personal convictions; and (3) the existence of a diff erentiated legal regime designed to safeguard their ideological integrity. The article examines how this special regime operates at the intersection of organizational autonomy and individual fundamental rights, particularly in the fi eld of labour law, where the need to balance workers’ freedoms with the employer’s ideological mission becomes most visible. It explores the implications of Article 4(2) of Directive 2000/78/EC, which provides a limited “religious exemption”, and highlights the interpretative challenges arising from the absence of shared defi nitions of “religion” and “personal convictions” in European law. Special attention is devoted to religious EBOs, whose complexity is intensifi ed by their independent legal orders, comprehensive belief systems, and constitutionally protected status. The article also situates EBOs within broader social dynamics, noting how immigration, multiculturalism, and increasing religious and ethnic diversity shape contemporary debates on ideological identity and non-discrimination. By integrating constitutional theory, EU law, and labour-law doctrine, the article advances a nuanced conceptual framework for understanding EBOs and clarifi es how legal systems mediate the relationship between ideological coherence and labour protections in pluralistic democracies.

ETHOS-BASED ORGANIZATIONS: IDEOLOGICAL IDENTITY AND DIFFERENTIATED LEGAL REGIMES

Sammassimo
2025

Abstract

This article off ers a systematic analysis of Ethos-Based Organizations (EBOs) — institutions whose identity, mission, and internal governance are shaped by a distinct ideological, religious, or philosophical ethos. Building on European and Italian legal sources, the study identifi es three constitutive elements of EBOs: (1) their nature as structured and durable organizations; (2) the presence of a clearly defi ned ideological character, grounded in religion or personal convictions; and (3) the existence of a diff erentiated legal regime designed to safeguard their ideological integrity. The article examines how this special regime operates at the intersection of organizational autonomy and individual fundamental rights, particularly in the fi eld of labour law, where the need to balance workers’ freedoms with the employer’s ideological mission becomes most visible. It explores the implications of Article 4(2) of Directive 2000/78/EC, which provides a limited “religious exemption”, and highlights the interpretative challenges arising from the absence of shared defi nitions of “religion” and “personal convictions” in European law. Special attention is devoted to religious EBOs, whose complexity is intensifi ed by their independent legal orders, comprehensive belief systems, and constitutionally protected status. The article also situates EBOs within broader social dynamics, noting how immigration, multiculturalism, and increasing religious and ethnic diversity shape contemporary debates on ideological identity and non-discrimination. By integrating constitutional theory, EU law, and labour-law doctrine, the article advances a nuanced conceptual framework for understanding EBOs and clarifi es how legal systems mediate the relationship between ideological coherence and labour protections in pluralistic democracies.
2025
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3591061
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact