Background: Advanced outbreak analytics were instru-mental in informing governmental decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, systematic evaluations of how modelling practices, data use and science–policy interactions evolved during this and previous emergencies remain scarce. Aim: This study assessed the evolution of modelling practices, data usage, gaps, and engagement between modellers and decision-makers to inform future global epidemic intelligence. Methods: We conducted a two-stage semiquantitative survey among modellers in a large European epidemic intelligence consortium. Responses were analysed descriptively across early, mid-and late-pandemic phases. We used policy citations in Overton to assess policy impact. Results: Our sample included 66 modelling contributions from 11 institutions in four European countries. COVID-19 modelling initially prioritised understanding epidemic dynamics; evaluating non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccination impacts later became equally important. Traditional surveillance data (e.g. case line lists) were widely available in near-real time. Conversely, real-time non-traditional data (notably social contact and behavioural surveys) and serologi-cal data were frequently reported as lacking. Gaps included poor stratification and incomplete geograph-ical coverage. Frequent bidirectional engagement with decision-makers shaped modelling scope and recom-mendations. However, fewer than half of the studies shared open-access code. Conclusions: We highlight the evolving use and needs of modelling during public health crises. Persistent gaps in the availability of non-traditional data underscore the need to rethink sustainable data collection and sharing practices, including from for-profit providers. Future preparedness should focus on strengthening collaborative platforms, research consortia and modelling networks to foster data and code sharing and effective collabo-ration between academia, decision-makers and data providers.

Modelling practices, data provisioning, sharing and dissemination needs for pandemic decision-making: a European survey-based modellers’ perspective, 2020 to 2022

Poletto C.
2025

Abstract

Background: Advanced outbreak analytics were instru-mental in informing governmental decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, systematic evaluations of how modelling practices, data use and science–policy interactions evolved during this and previous emergencies remain scarce. Aim: This study assessed the evolution of modelling practices, data usage, gaps, and engagement between modellers and decision-makers to inform future global epidemic intelligence. Methods: We conducted a two-stage semiquantitative survey among modellers in a large European epidemic intelligence consortium. Responses were analysed descriptively across early, mid-and late-pandemic phases. We used policy citations in Overton to assess policy impact. Results: Our sample included 66 modelling contributions from 11 institutions in four European countries. COVID-19 modelling initially prioritised understanding epidemic dynamics; evaluating non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccination impacts later became equally important. Traditional surveillance data (e.g. case line lists) were widely available in near-real time. Conversely, real-time non-traditional data (notably social contact and behavioural surveys) and serologi-cal data were frequently reported as lacking. Gaps included poor stratification and incomplete geograph-ical coverage. Frequent bidirectional engagement with decision-makers shaped modelling scope and recom-mendations. However, fewer than half of the studies shared open-access code. Conclusions: We highlight the evolving use and needs of modelling during public health crises. Persistent gaps in the availability of non-traditional data underscore the need to rethink sustainable data collection and sharing practices, including from for-profit providers. Future preparedness should focus on strengthening collaborative platforms, research consortia and modelling networks to foster data and code sharing and effective collabo-ration between academia, decision-makers and data providers.
2025
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
unpaywall-bitstream--1525487800.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Published (Publisher's Version of Record)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 483.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
483.04 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3611063
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
  • OpenAlex 3
social impact