Background: Advanced outbreak analytics were instru-mental in informing governmental decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, systematic evaluations of how modelling practices, data use and science–policy interactions evolved during this and previous emergencies remain scarce. Aim: This study assessed the evolution of modelling practices, data usage, gaps, and engagement between modellers and decision-makers to inform future global epidemic intelligence. Methods: We conducted a two-stage semiquantitative survey among modellers in a large European epidemic intelligence consortium. Responses were analysed descriptively across early, mid-and late-pandemic phases. We used policy citations in Overton to assess policy impact. Results: Our sample included 66 modelling contributions from 11 institutions in four European countries. COVID-19 modelling initially prioritised understanding epidemic dynamics; evaluating non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccination impacts later became equally important. Traditional surveillance data (e.g. case line lists) were widely available in near-real time. Conversely, real-time non-traditional data (notably social contact and behavioural surveys) and serologi-cal data were frequently reported as lacking. Gaps included poor stratification and incomplete geograph-ical coverage. Frequent bidirectional engagement with decision-makers shaped modelling scope and recom-mendations. However, fewer than half of the studies shared open-access code. Conclusions: We highlight the evolving use and needs of modelling during public health crises. Persistent gaps in the availability of non-traditional data underscore the need to rethink sustainable data collection and sharing practices, including from for-profit providers. Future preparedness should focus on strengthening collaborative platforms, research consortia and modelling networks to foster data and code sharing and effective collabo-ration between academia, decision-makers and data providers.
Modelling practices, data provisioning, sharing and dissemination needs for pandemic decision-making: a European survey-based modellers’ perspective, 2020 to 2022
Poletto C.
2025
Abstract
Background: Advanced outbreak analytics were instru-mental in informing governmental decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, systematic evaluations of how modelling practices, data use and science–policy interactions evolved during this and previous emergencies remain scarce. Aim: This study assessed the evolution of modelling practices, data usage, gaps, and engagement between modellers and decision-makers to inform future global epidemic intelligence. Methods: We conducted a two-stage semiquantitative survey among modellers in a large European epidemic intelligence consortium. Responses were analysed descriptively across early, mid-and late-pandemic phases. We used policy citations in Overton to assess policy impact. Results: Our sample included 66 modelling contributions from 11 institutions in four European countries. COVID-19 modelling initially prioritised understanding epidemic dynamics; evaluating non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccination impacts later became equally important. Traditional surveillance data (e.g. case line lists) were widely available in near-real time. Conversely, real-time non-traditional data (notably social contact and behavioural surveys) and serologi-cal data were frequently reported as lacking. Gaps included poor stratification and incomplete geograph-ical coverage. Frequent bidirectional engagement with decision-makers shaped modelling scope and recom-mendations. However, fewer than half of the studies shared open-access code. Conclusions: We highlight the evolving use and needs of modelling during public health crises. Persistent gaps in the availability of non-traditional data underscore the need to rethink sustainable data collection and sharing practices, including from for-profit providers. Future preparedness should focus on strengthening collaborative platforms, research consortia and modelling networks to foster data and code sharing and effective collabo-ration between academia, decision-makers and data providers.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
unpaywall-bitstream--1525487800.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Published (Publisher's Version of Record)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
483.04 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
483.04 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




