We investigate compressible turbulent boundary layers over prism-shaped roughness using direct numerical simulations at Mach 2 and 4, with adiabatic and isothermal walls. Analysis of instantaneous and mean-density fields shows that compressibility effects and wall-thermal conditions significantly influence the boundary-layer structure, although the roughness elements remain submerged within the subsonic layer. While roughness disrupts near-wall momentum–energy coupling within the roughness sublayer, the Reynolds analogy recovers in the outer region where velocity and temperature fields exhibit smooth-wall-like similarity. A systematic comparison of different formulations indicates that a mixed Prandtl number approach provides the most accurate heat-flux predictions among the tested closures. Based on these observations, we develop a wall model that couples drag prediction for small prism-shaped roughness patterns with a compressibility transformation and a temperature–velocity closure. The formulation is modular, allowing the straightforward incorporation of alternative closures and traditional correlations. The model predicts both wall-shear stress and heat flux using only roughness geometry and information from the matching location, and shows good a priori agreement with the present direct numerical simulation data.

On the Reynolds analogy for high-speed rough-wall flows: implications for wall modelling

Cogo M.;Depieri D.;Picano F.
2026

Abstract

We investigate compressible turbulent boundary layers over prism-shaped roughness using direct numerical simulations at Mach 2 and 4, with adiabatic and isothermal walls. Analysis of instantaneous and mean-density fields shows that compressibility effects and wall-thermal conditions significantly influence the boundary-layer structure, although the roughness elements remain submerged within the subsonic layer. While roughness disrupts near-wall momentum–energy coupling within the roughness sublayer, the Reynolds analogy recovers in the outer region where velocity and temperature fields exhibit smooth-wall-like similarity. A systematic comparison of different formulations indicates that a mixed Prandtl number approach provides the most accurate heat-flux predictions among the tested closures. Based on these observations, we develop a wall model that couples drag prediction for small prism-shaped roughness patterns with a compressibility transformation and a temperature–velocity closure. The formulation is modular, allowing the straightforward incorporation of alternative closures and traditional correlations. The model predicts both wall-shear stress and heat flux using only roughness geometry and information from the matching location, and shows good a priori agreement with the present direct numerical simulation data.
2026
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
unpaywall-bitstream-923951512.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Published (Publisher's Version of Record)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.34 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.34 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3612758
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact