The effect of Outdoor or Indoor housing systems on the growth, welfare and carcass and meat quality of a local rabbit Population was investigated. The slaughter age was 103 2 days. Open-field tests showed an effective capacity of the Outdoor group to combat stressors. Compared to Indoor rabbits, Outdoor rabbits showed better growth performance and higher slaughter weight (SW) (2535 vs 2137 g; P < 0.01). Outdoor housing conditions increased the physical activity of rabbits and their hind legs were more developed (36.1% vs 34.9%; P < 0.01). Slaughter yield was lower in Outdoor rabbits (57.8% vs 58.4% SW: P < 0.05) due to the higher skin proportion (17.2% vs 15.6% SW; P < 0.05). Outdoor rabbit meat showed lower L* value (L. lumborum: 55.6 vs 59.2; P < 0.01; B. femoris: 53.0 vs 55.5; P < 0.01) and cooking loss (L. lumborum: 15.9% vs 18.1%; P < 0.05). Outdoor rabbit hind leg meat was characterized by lower water (74.5% vs 75.1%; P < 0.01) and higher protein (22.9% vs 22.6%; P < 0.01) and fat (1.4% vs 1.1%: P < 0.01) contents; lipids were lower in SFA and higher in MUFA. Outdoor rearing seems to be a possible alternative housing system that allays the ethical concerns of modern consumers while also providing good meat quality.

Effect of an outdoor rearing system on the welfare, growth performance, carcass and meat quality of a slow-growing rabbit population

DALLE ZOTTE, ANTONELLA;
2009

Abstract

The effect of Outdoor or Indoor housing systems on the growth, welfare and carcass and meat quality of a local rabbit Population was investigated. The slaughter age was 103 2 days. Open-field tests showed an effective capacity of the Outdoor group to combat stressors. Compared to Indoor rabbits, Outdoor rabbits showed better growth performance and higher slaughter weight (SW) (2535 vs 2137 g; P < 0.01). Outdoor housing conditions increased the physical activity of rabbits and their hind legs were more developed (36.1% vs 34.9%; P < 0.01). Slaughter yield was lower in Outdoor rabbits (57.8% vs 58.4% SW: P < 0.05) due to the higher skin proportion (17.2% vs 15.6% SW; P < 0.05). Outdoor rabbit meat showed lower L* value (L. lumborum: 55.6 vs 59.2; P < 0.01; B. femoris: 53.0 vs 55.5; P < 0.01) and cooking loss (L. lumborum: 15.9% vs 18.1%; P < 0.05). Outdoor rabbit hind leg meat was characterized by lower water (74.5% vs 75.1%; P < 0.01) and higher protein (22.9% vs 22.6%; P < 0.01) and fat (1.4% vs 1.1%: P < 0.01) contents; lipids were lower in SFA and higher in MUFA. Outdoor rearing seems to be a possible alternative housing system that allays the ethical concerns of modern consumers while also providing good meat quality.
2009
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/2377396
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 35
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 36
social impact