Padua University Library (Italy) preserves only a limited number of Greek manuscripts. Among them, the Patavinus 560 stands out for its content and age. This manuscript transmits works of Basil of Cesarea and Plutach, an almost unique pairing, and its oldest codicological unit was penned in the late 10th century. For almost a century the Patavinus has been considered to be part of the well-known Heid. Palat. gr. 153, a 10th century manuscripts containing a selection of Plutarch’s Moralia which Jean Irigoin attributed to the ‘editorial’ effort characteristic of the intellectual awakening in 10th and 11th century Constantinople. In 2005, Mario Manfredini challenged this view by disproving what he coined an “imaginary hybrid” trough textual and codicological observations. The present study offers a reassessment of the situation, and bases itself on the comprehensive analysis of the Patavinus and the Palatinus. Both originally independent, the manuscripts were united in one codex in the late 13th/early 14th century. This “hybrid” was again separated in the 16th century: one part remained in Padua, in the Abbey of Santa Giustina, while the other was transferred to Heidelberg. In appendix, a new evaluation of the Marcianus 344 is offered. This is a 12th century manuscript in which we were able to identify one of the scribes working in the Patavinus+Palatinus.

Vicende antiche e moderne di un codice di Plutarco (Patav. Bibl. Univ. 560 + Heid. Palat. gr. 153). Fra Costantinopoli, Padova e Heidelberg

Ciro Giacomelli;
2020

Abstract

Padua University Library (Italy) preserves only a limited number of Greek manuscripts. Among them, the Patavinus 560 stands out for its content and age. This manuscript transmits works of Basil of Cesarea and Plutach, an almost unique pairing, and its oldest codicological unit was penned in the late 10th century. For almost a century the Patavinus has been considered to be part of the well-known Heid. Palat. gr. 153, a 10th century manuscripts containing a selection of Plutarch’s Moralia which Jean Irigoin attributed to the ‘editorial’ effort characteristic of the intellectual awakening in 10th and 11th century Constantinople. In 2005, Mario Manfredini challenged this view by disproving what he coined an “imaginary hybrid” trough textual and codicological observations. The present study offers a reassessment of the situation, and bases itself on the comprehensive analysis of the Patavinus and the Palatinus. Both originally independent, the manuscripts were united in one codex in the late 13th/early 14th century. This “hybrid” was again separated in the 16th century: one part remained in Padua, in the Abbey of Santa Giustina, while the other was transferred to Heidelberg. In appendix, a new evaluation of the Marcianus 344 is offered. This is a 12th century manuscript in which we were able to identify one of the scribes working in the Patavinus+Palatinus.
2020
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Giacomelli_120_compressed-2.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Published (publisher's version)
Licenza: Accesso privato - non pubblico
Dimensione 4.05 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.05 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3342217
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact