A survey published by Nature in 2016 revealed that more than 70% of researchers failed in their attempt to reproduce another researcher’s experiments, and over 50% failed to reproduce one of their own experiments; a state of affairs that has been termed the ‘reproducibility crisis’ in science. The purpose of this work is to contribute to the field by presenting a reproducibility study of a Natural Language Processing paper about “Language Representation Models for Fine-Grained Sentiment Classification”. A thorough analysis of the methodology, experimental setting, and experimental results are presented, leading to a discussion of the issues and the necessary steps involved in this kind of study.

A Thorough Reproducibility Study on Sentiment Classification: Methodology, Experimental Setting, Results

Di Nunzio G. M.
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
2023

Abstract

A survey published by Nature in 2016 revealed that more than 70% of researchers failed in their attempt to reproduce another researcher’s experiments, and over 50% failed to reproduce one of their own experiments; a state of affairs that has been termed the ‘reproducibility crisis’ in science. The purpose of this work is to contribute to the field by presenting a reproducibility study of a Natural Language Processing paper about “Language Representation Models for Fine-Grained Sentiment Classification”. A thorough analysis of the methodology, experimental setting, and experimental results are presented, leading to a discussion of the issues and the necessary steps involved in this kind of study.
2023
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
information-14-00076-v3.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Published (publisher's version)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 3.03 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.03 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3473247
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact