Background and aims: Removal/suppression of the primary etiological factor reduces the risk of decompensation and mortality in compensated cirrhosis. However, in decompensated cirrhosis, the impact of etiologic treatment is less predictable. We aimed to evaluate the impact of etiological treatment in patients with cirrhosis who developed ascites as single index decompensating event. Methods: Patients with cirrhosis and ascites as single first decompensation event were included and followed until death, liver transplantation, or Q3/2021. The etiology was considered 'cured' (alcohol abstinence, hepatitis C cure, hepatitis B suppression) versus 'controlled' (partial removal of etiologic factors) versus 'uncontrolled'. Results: 622 patients were included in the study. Etiology was 'cured' in 146 patients (24%), 'controlled' in 170 (27%) and 'uncontrolled' in 306 (49%). During follow up, 350 patients (56%) developed further decompensation. In multivariable analysis (adjusted for age, sex, varices, etiology, Child-Pugh class, creatinine, sodium and era of decompensation), etiological cure was independently associated with a lower risk of further decompensation (HR = 0.46; p = 0.001). During follow up, 250 patients (40.2%) died, while 104 (16.7%) underwent LT. In multivariable analysis, etiological cure was independently associated with a lower mortality risk (HR = 0.35, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In patients with cirrhosis and ascites as single first decompensating event, the cure of liver disease etiology represents a main treatment goal since this translates into considerably lower risks of further decompensation and mortality.

Etiological cure prevents further decompensation and mortality in cirrhotic patients with ascites as the single first decompensating event

Tonon, Marta;Incicco, Simone;Barone, Anna;Gambino, Carmine Gabriele;Angeli, Paolo;Piano, Salvatore
2023

Abstract

Background and aims: Removal/suppression of the primary etiological factor reduces the risk of decompensation and mortality in compensated cirrhosis. However, in decompensated cirrhosis, the impact of etiologic treatment is less predictable. We aimed to evaluate the impact of etiological treatment in patients with cirrhosis who developed ascites as single index decompensating event. Methods: Patients with cirrhosis and ascites as single first decompensation event were included and followed until death, liver transplantation, or Q3/2021. The etiology was considered 'cured' (alcohol abstinence, hepatitis C cure, hepatitis B suppression) versus 'controlled' (partial removal of etiologic factors) versus 'uncontrolled'. Results: 622 patients were included in the study. Etiology was 'cured' in 146 patients (24%), 'controlled' in 170 (27%) and 'uncontrolled' in 306 (49%). During follow up, 350 patients (56%) developed further decompensation. In multivariable analysis (adjusted for age, sex, varices, etiology, Child-Pugh class, creatinine, sodium and era of decompensation), etiological cure was independently associated with a lower risk of further decompensation (HR = 0.46; p = 0.001). During follow up, 250 patients (40.2%) died, while 104 (16.7%) underwent LT. In multivariable analysis, etiological cure was independently associated with a lower mortality risk (HR = 0.35, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In patients with cirrhosis and ascites as single first decompensating event, the cure of liver disease etiology represents a main treatment goal since this translates into considerably lower risks of further decompensation and mortality.
2023
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3479572
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact