The study aimed to assess respondents’ opinions on healthiness of various types of meat derived from different animal species across multiple countries. A total of 1116 questionnaires from Spain, Italy, Poland, Hungary and China were analysed. According to the perception of all respondents, the ranking on the healthiness of different types of meat is as follows: fish (39.9%), rabbit (20.8%), chicken (15.1%), beef (13.4%), pork (4.9%), lamb (4.3%) and horse meat (1.6%). In specific countries, variations in rankings were observed. In Italy, Poland and Hungary fish claimed the top position, while in Spain rabbit meat was ranked the highest. Conversely, in China, fish and beef were considered the healthiest options. Gender exhibited only a marginal effect. Fish was considered the healthiest for all ages. With the exception of China, where beef overtook the second place, rabbit meat was in the second position. Regarding household income, a difference emerged only in the case of fish; the 'Live well' and 'Live very well' groups considered it healthier than those with lower incomes. The findings suggest that respondents’ opinions on the healthiness of different meat types could be leveraged for the development of marketing strategies with the meat industry.

Consumer views on the healthiness of meat from various animal species: A comprehensive survey including fish

Antonella Dalle Zotte
Writing – Review & Editing
;
2024

Abstract

The study aimed to assess respondents’ opinions on healthiness of various types of meat derived from different animal species across multiple countries. A total of 1116 questionnaires from Spain, Italy, Poland, Hungary and China were analysed. According to the perception of all respondents, the ranking on the healthiness of different types of meat is as follows: fish (39.9%), rabbit (20.8%), chicken (15.1%), beef (13.4%), pork (4.9%), lamb (4.3%) and horse meat (1.6%). In specific countries, variations in rankings were observed. In Italy, Poland and Hungary fish claimed the top position, while in Spain rabbit meat was ranked the highest. Conversely, in China, fish and beef were considered the healthiest options. Gender exhibited only a marginal effect. Fish was considered the healthiest for all ages. With the exception of China, where beef overtook the second place, rabbit meat was in the second position. Regarding household income, a difference emerged only in the case of fish; the 'Live well' and 'Live very well' groups considered it healthier than those with lower incomes. The findings suggest that respondents’ opinions on the healthiness of different meat types could be leveraged for the development of marketing strategies with the meat industry.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S2772502224001434-main.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Published (Publisher's Version of Record)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 768.44 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
768.44 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/3535664
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact