Continuous Glucose Monitoring sensors (CGMs) have revolutionized type 1 diabetes (T1D) management. In particular, in several cases, the retrospective analysis of CGM recordings allows clinicians to review and adjust patients' therapy. However, in this set-up, the artifacts that are often present in CGM data could lead to incorrect therapeutic actions. To mitigate this risk, we investigate how to detect one of the most common of these artifacts, the so-called pressure induced sensor attenuations, by means of anomaly detection algorithms. Specifically, these methods belong to the class of unsupervised techniques, which is particularly appealing since it does not require a labeled dataset, hardly available in practice. After having designed five features to highlight the anomalous state of the sensor, 8 different methods (e.g. Isolation Forest and Histogram-based Outlier Score) are assessed both in silico using the UVa/Padova Type 1 Diabetes Simulator and on real data of 36 subjects monitored for about 10 days. In the in silico scenario, the best results are achieved with Isolation Forest, which recognized the 74% of the failures generating on average only 2 false alerts during the whole monitoring time. In real data, Isolation Forest is confirmed to be effective in the detection of failures, achieving a recall of 55% and generating 3 false alarms in 10 days. By allowing to detect more than 50% of the artifacts while discarding only a few portions of correct data in several days of monitoring, the proposed approach could effectively improve the quality of CGM data used by clinicians to retrospectively evaluate and adjust T1D therapy.
Unsupervised Retrospective Detection of Pressure Induced Failures in Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors for T1D Management
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
			
		
		
		
		
			
			
				
				
					
					
					
					
						
							
						
						
					
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
			
			
		
			
			
				
				
					
					
					
					
						
						
							
							
						
					
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
			
			
		
			
			
				
				
					
					
					
					
						
							
						
						
					
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
			
			
		
			
			
				
				
					
					
					
					
						
							
						
						
					
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
			
			
		
			
			
				
				
					
					
					
					
						
							
						
						
					
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
			
			
		
		
		
		
	
Idi, Elena;Facchinetti, Andrea;Sparacino, Giovanni;Favero, Simone Del
	
		
		
	
			2024
Abstract
Continuous Glucose Monitoring sensors (CGMs) have revolutionized type 1 diabetes (T1D) management. In particular, in several cases, the retrospective analysis of CGM recordings allows clinicians to review and adjust patients' therapy. However, in this set-up, the artifacts that are often present in CGM data could lead to incorrect therapeutic actions. To mitigate this risk, we investigate how to detect one of the most common of these artifacts, the so-called pressure induced sensor attenuations, by means of anomaly detection algorithms. Specifically, these methods belong to the class of unsupervised techniques, which is particularly appealing since it does not require a labeled dataset, hardly available in practice. After having designed five features to highlight the anomalous state of the sensor, 8 different methods (e.g. Isolation Forest and Histogram-based Outlier Score) are assessed both in silico using the UVa/Padova Type 1 Diabetes Simulator and on real data of 36 subjects monitored for about 10 days. In the in silico scenario, the best results are achieved with Isolation Forest, which recognized the 74% of the failures generating on average only 2 false alerts during the whole monitoring time. In real data, Isolation Forest is confirmed to be effective in the detection of failures, achieving a recall of 55% and generating 3 false alarms in 10 days. By allowing to detect more than 50% of the artifacts while discarding only a few portions of correct data in several days of monitoring, the proposed approach could effectively improve the quality of CGM data used by clinicians to retrospectively evaluate and adjust T1D therapy.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 
									
										
										
										
										
											
												
												
												    
												
											
										
									
									
										
										
											Unsupervised_Retrospective_Detection_of_Pressure_Induced_Failures_in_Continuous_Glucose_Monitoring_Sensors_for_T1D_Management.pdf
										
																				
									
										
											 accesso aperto 
											Tipologia:
											Published (Publisher's Version of Record)
										 
									
									
									
									
										
											Licenza:
											
											
												Creative commons
												
												
													
													
													
												
												
											
										 
									
									
										Dimensione
										940.66 kB
									 
									
										Formato
										Adobe PDF
									 
										
										
								 | 
								940.66 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri | 
| 
									
										
										
										
										
											
												
												
												    
												
											
										
									
									
										
										
											Unsupervised_Retrospective_Detection_of_Pressure_Induced_Failures_in_Continuous_Glucose_Monitoring_Sensors_for_T1D_Management.pdf
										
																				
									
										
											 accesso aperto 
											Tipologia:
											Published (Publisher's Version of Record)
										 
									
									
									
									
										
											Licenza:
											
											
												Creative commons
												
												
													
													
													
												
												
											
										 
									
									
										Dimensione
										3.4 MB
									 
									
										Formato
										Adobe PDF
									 
										
										
								 | 
								3.4 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri | 
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




