The European Health Data Space (EDHS) is presented as strengthening enabling EU citizens' (digital) rights, in particular as it aims at empowering them to control their own health data whilst at the same time facilitating their secondary use. However, the Regulation proposal issued in 2022, later amended and recently adopted raised various critiques, in particular as it poses serious concerns regarding the protection of fundamental rights as well as some fundamental democratic principles and values. The text of the Regulation presents many issues, starting from a patent contradiction between its two main declared aims, namely that of empowering citizens rights over their health data and favoring the secondary use of health data for the benefits of society, as the latter risks to be done at the expenses of the first. Moreover, Several regulation provisions seem to be in contradiction with EU primary and secondary legislation, as well as with some relevant body of soft law. Regarding primary sources, some provisions of the proposal pose concerns with respect to the rights to privacy and data protection as enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental rights (art. 7 and 8, respectively) or the balance between public and private interest. Regarding secondary sources, some dispositions overlap and are not clearly coordinated with principles, rules and procedures set out by the GDPR. Regarding relevant soft law bodies, some dispositions are not fully aligned with some of the core principles of the Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) model promoted by the EU Commission. Moreover, the Regulation does not seem to be fully aligned with the concept of of "data altruism" (which it aims at favoring), given that it foresees the possibility of overriding EU citizens' choices related to health data sharing even against their explicit will (opt-out) by providing alternative grounds of legitimizing health data processing in the name of public good. This article will consider these concerns with a focus on their impact on EU (Digital) Citizenship, in particular considering that 2025 will be the European Year of Digital Citizenship Education.
Lo spazio europeo dei dati sanitari e il buon cittadino europeo: fare di virtù necessità?
Gorgoni, Guido
2025
Abstract
The European Health Data Space (EDHS) is presented as strengthening enabling EU citizens' (digital) rights, in particular as it aims at empowering them to control their own health data whilst at the same time facilitating their secondary use. However, the Regulation proposal issued in 2022, later amended and recently adopted raised various critiques, in particular as it poses serious concerns regarding the protection of fundamental rights as well as some fundamental democratic principles and values. The text of the Regulation presents many issues, starting from a patent contradiction between its two main declared aims, namely that of empowering citizens rights over their health data and favoring the secondary use of health data for the benefits of society, as the latter risks to be done at the expenses of the first. Moreover, Several regulation provisions seem to be in contradiction with EU primary and secondary legislation, as well as with some relevant body of soft law. Regarding primary sources, some provisions of the proposal pose concerns with respect to the rights to privacy and data protection as enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental rights (art. 7 and 8, respectively) or the balance between public and private interest. Regarding secondary sources, some dispositions overlap and are not clearly coordinated with principles, rules and procedures set out by the GDPR. Regarding relevant soft law bodies, some dispositions are not fully aligned with some of the core principles of the Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) model promoted by the EU Commission. Moreover, the Regulation does not seem to be fully aligned with the concept of of "data altruism" (which it aims at favoring), given that it foresees the possibility of overriding EU citizens' choices related to health data sharing even against their explicit will (opt-out) by providing alternative grounds of legitimizing health data processing in the name of public good. This article will consider these concerns with a focus on their impact on EU (Digital) Citizenship, in particular considering that 2025 will be the European Year of Digital Citizenship Education.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




