The available evidence for receptor-receptor interactions between adenosine A(2A), dopamine D(2), cannabinoid CB(1), and metabotropic glutamate mGlu(5) receptors (A(2A), D(2), CB(1), and mGlu(5), respectively) is revised under the "receptor mosaic" perspective. Furthermore, the concept of "hub receptor" is defined in accordance with informatics and it is tentatively illustrated in the case of the hypothesized tetramer formed by the above mentioned receptors. On the basis of some biochemical features of the four receptors and of a bioinformatics analysis, an objective deduction of their "similarity" has been obtained. To this aim the Canberra, Euclidean and Chebyshev multivariate distance metrics have been used. It is interesting to note that A(2A) and D(2) are the most different ones, while CB(1) and mGlu(5) are the most similar ones among the four receptors analyzed. Finally, by means of a bioinformatics analysis based on different approaches the possible binding sites mediating G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) interactions have been indicated. It is interesting to note that in some instances accordance has been found between the bioinformatics indications and the available experimental data.

An integrated view on the role of receptor mosaics at perisynaptic level: focus on adenosine A(2A), dopamine D(2), cannabinoid CB(1), and metabotropic glutamate mGlu(5) receptors

GUIDOLIN, DIEGO;ALBERTIN, GIOVANNA;
2010

Abstract

The available evidence for receptor-receptor interactions between adenosine A(2A), dopamine D(2), cannabinoid CB(1), and metabotropic glutamate mGlu(5) receptors (A(2A), D(2), CB(1), and mGlu(5), respectively) is revised under the "receptor mosaic" perspective. Furthermore, the concept of "hub receptor" is defined in accordance with informatics and it is tentatively illustrated in the case of the hypothesized tetramer formed by the above mentioned receptors. On the basis of some biochemical features of the four receptors and of a bioinformatics analysis, an objective deduction of their "similarity" has been obtained. To this aim the Canberra, Euclidean and Chebyshev multivariate distance metrics have been used. It is interesting to note that A(2A) and D(2) are the most different ones, while CB(1) and mGlu(5) are the most similar ones among the four receptors analyzed. Finally, by means of a bioinformatics analysis based on different approaches the possible binding sites mediating G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) interactions have been indicated. It is interesting to note that in some instances accordance has been found between the bioinformatics indications and the available experimental data.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11577/2475114
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 32
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact